On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Tim Bird tim.b...@sonymobile.com wrote:
The way the feature is expressed in the current code is that a
set of drivers are marked for deferred initialization (I'll refer
to this as issue 0). Then, at boot: 1)
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Tim Bird wrote:
I have been thinking about the points you made previously,
and have given the problem space some more thought. I agree
that as it stands this is a very niche solution, and it would
be good to think about the broader picture and how things
might be
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Several patches are linked from
http://elinux.org/Deferred_Initcalls
Latest version is
http://elinux.org/images/5/51/0001-Port-deferred-initcalls-to-3.10.patch
In the hope of providing some constructive and concrete feedback to this
thread,
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Rob Landley wrote:
On 10/23/14 19:36, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
As you know already, you can do anything you want on your own. That's
granted by the GPL.
I'm pretty sure I could have done anything I wanted on my own with
System 6 unix in the 1970's (modulo being 7
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote:
I'm not sure why this attention to reading the status. The salient feature
here is that the initializations are deferred until user space tells the
kernel
to proceed. It's the initiation of the trigger from user-space that matters.
The whole purpose
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 23/10/2014 at 13:56:44 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote :
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote:
I'm not sure why this attention to reading the status. The salient
feature
here is that the initializations are deferred until user space
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:05 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 23/10/2014 at 13:56:44 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote :
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote:
I'm not sure why this attention
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rob Landley wrote:
On 10/23/14 14:05, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 23/10/2014 at 13:56:44 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote :
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote:
Why a trigger? I'm suggesting no trigger at all is needed
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rob Landley wrote:
Doing hardware probing at low priorities can cause really _fun_ latency
spikes in the system as something grabs a lock and then sleeps. (And
doing this at the realtime scheduling where it won't do that translates
those latency spikes into the
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Rob Landley wrote:
On 10/21/14 14:58, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote:
I'm going to respond to several comments in this one message (sorry for
the likely confusion)
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:31 AM, Nicolas Pitre [n
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Bird, Tim tim.b...@sonymobile.com wrote:
The answer is pretty easy, I think. I tried to mainline it once but
failed, and didn't really try again. If it is being found useful, we
should try to mainline it again,
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote:
I'm going to respond to several comments in this one message (sorry for the
likely confusion)
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:31 AM, Nicolas Pitre [n...@fluxnic.net] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:11 AM
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Brad Arnold wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on an embedded board which uses u-boot + linux. At
manufacturing time, the device serial number will be programmed into OTP
memory on NAND (probably from within u-boot). We'd like the linux kernel
to make this serial number available
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010, Tim Bird wrote:
On 11/09/2010 03:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 18:07, Tim Bird wrote:
It was noted at the summit that several CE companies and embedded
projects will be using (or are already
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Let's say that on a given platform, I need to twiddle with a GPIO pin
when a chip enters and exits suspend.
What driver? What platform? This may depend on those.
One way to do that is to hack the driver itself; a slightly
less-inelegant way is to
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:59:50AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 10:57 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
You miss the size increase
16 matches
Mail list logo
