Re: cpuidle - minimum time for sleep

2014-10-09 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:28:23 +0300, Ran Shalit said: Does anybody know what is the minimum expected time for sleep period with the cpuidle ? Both processor dependent and sleep level dependent. There's a certain amount of latency induced by the hardware waking up. Look at

Re: [PATCH 1/3]: Replace kernel/ with kernel/

2009-01-03 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:36:04 CST, Rob Landley said: On Saturday 03 January 2009 06:28:22 Ingo Oeser wrote: +for i in MSEC 1000 USEC 100 +do + NAME=$(echo $i | awk '{print $1}') cut -d' ' -f1 does the same + PERIOD=$(echo $i | awk '{print $2}') cut -d' ' -f2 does the

Re: [PATCH 1/23] make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections

2008-07-01 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:33:48 +0200, Denys Vlasenko said: The purpose of these patches is to make kernel buildable with gcc -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections. Newer gcc and binutils can do dead code and data removal at link time. It is achieved using combination of -ffunction-sections