Re: [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size

2010-02-20 Thread Wu Fengguang
Hi Matt, On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 04:20:23AM +0800, Matt Mackall wrote: On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:59 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:42:49AM +0800, Jamie Lokier wrote: Matt Mackall wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:46 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: Chris,

Re: [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size

2010-02-12 Thread Wu Fengguang
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:42:49AM +0800, Jamie Lokier wrote: Matt Mackall wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:46 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: Chris, Firstly inform the linux-embedded maintainers :) I think it's a good suggestion to add a config option (CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE).

Re: [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size

2010-02-12 Thread Matt Mackall
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:42 +, Jamie Lokier wrote: Matt Mackall wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:46 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: Chris, Firstly inform the linux-embedded maintainers :) I think it's a good suggestion to add a config option (CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE). Will

Re: [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size

2010-02-11 Thread Matt Mackall
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:46 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: Chris, Firstly inform the linux-embedded maintainers :) I think it's a good suggestion to add a config option (CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE). Will update the patch.. I don't have a strong opinion here beyond the nagging feeling that we

Re: [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size

2010-02-08 Thread Wu Fengguang
Chris, Firstly inform the linux-embedded maintainers :) I think it's a good suggestion to add a config option (CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE). Will update the patch.. Thanks, Fengguang On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:20:31PM +0800, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: This is related to our discussion from October