On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:24:04PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> >@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> >+/*
> >+ * FILE NAME fs/pramfs/namei.c
> FILE NAME != namei.c
Yes, that's why you should never do such filename comments which are not
only utterly prone to be out of data, but also 100% useless.
--
To unsubscr
On 10/10/2010 17:37, Marco Stornelli wrote:
From: Marco Stornelli
Test module.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
--- linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++
2010/10/10 Randy Dunlap :
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:37:49 +0200 Marco Stornelli wrote:
>
> Above 2 lines need to indented more.
>
Ack.
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Attempt an unprotected clear of checksum information in the
>> + * superblock, this should
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:37:49 +0200 Marco Stornelli wrote:
> From: Marco Stornelli
>
> Test module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
> ---
> diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
> linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
> --- linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c 1970-01-01
From: Marco Stornelli
Test module.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
--- linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c2
