Re: [PATCH 5/5] KBUS source file

2011-02-28 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:25:41PM +, Tony Ibbs wrote: > > On 28 Feb 2011, at 19:23, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > You are using /proc/* to something that is not process related. > > At lkml you will be requested to use something else. > > OK. That's mainly through ignorance of what I *should* b

Re: [PATCH 5/5] KBUS source file

2011-02-28 Thread Tony Ibbs
On 28 Feb 2011, at 19:23, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > You are using /proc/* to something that is not process related. > At lkml you will be requested to use something else. OK. That's mainly through ignorance of what I *should* be using instead (and perhaps poor reading of Linux Device Drivers). Do yo

Re: [PATCH 5/5] KBUS source file

2011-02-28 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:26:49PM +, Tony Ibbs wrote: > Apologies, my fifth patch (the actual KBUS source file) appears to be > too long - I hadn't realise the 100,000 character limit on majordomo > messages. The file as submitted is that at: > > > https://github.com/crazyscot/linux-2.6-kb

Re: [PATCH 5/5] KBUS source file

2011-02-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:26:49 + Tony Ibbs wrote: > Apologies, my fifth patch (the actual KBUS source file) appears to be > too long - I hadn't realise the 100,000 character limit on majordomo > messages. The file as submitted is that at: > > > https://github.com/crazyscot/linux-2.6-kbus/blo

Re: [PATCH 5/5] KBUS source file

2011-02-27 Thread Tony Ibbs
Apologies, my fifth patch (the actual KBUS source file) appears to be too long - I hadn't realise the 100,000 character limit on majordomo messages. The file as submitted is that at: https://github.com/crazyscot/linux-2.6-kbus/blob/6cc3262bd3e28757179dd8a0d30298dfb2f70845/ipc/kbus.c If there i