Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), [EMAIL PROTECTED] list

thing for retrieving source tarballs. Just query the DB, never ever care about individual URLs in you local build system. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

the platform. Isnt that hard. In all these years I had no case where it couldn't be circumvented. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de

Re: Cross Compiler and loads of issues

all the QM works to individual distros. I'm glad this plan was dropped. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

-- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

engineering from ground up. BTW: python is one of the packages didn't pass a single one of my QM constraints (hey, not completely corrent, IMHO, install prefix was passed ;-O) cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

-- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

with the entire source of your package? Yeah, that's one of those things in autotools I never understood: why isn't there just one function for each type of check/action, which is just called with the right params ? cu -- - Enrico Weigelt

Re: cross-compiling alternatives

? grmpf ... well, i'll stick w/ my 5-lines wrapper script ;-o Enrico Yep, it doesn't take $SYSROOT (as my original patch did), but with Enrico some prefix ... PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR ack. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

-- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

structure their packages properly use something else ;-P cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

* Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Monday 16 June 2008 17:15:37 Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: CMake has a cache, where the values of variables are stored, e.g. if an option is enabled or not, or where a library has been found (e.g

Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

really usable for everyone - for now it's more an academic issue. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit