[PATCH] Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL. (attempt 2)

2011-01-10 Thread Rob Landley
On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Probably a worthwhile thing to do, IMO. If there's some net-specific CONFIG_DEBUG_ setting then that wold be a better thing to use. However the patch was a) wordwrapped, b) space-stuffed and c) not cc'ed to the networking list. So its prospects

Re: [PATCH] Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL. (attempt 2)

2011-01-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:35:33 -0600 Rob Landley wrote: On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Probably a worthwhile thing to do, IMO. If there's some net-specific CONFIG_DEBUG_ setting then that wold be a better thing to use. However the patch was a) wordwrapped, b) space-stuffed

Re: [PATCH] Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL. (attempt 2)

2011-01-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:35:33 -0600 Rob Landley wrote: On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Probably a worthwhile thing to do, IMO. If there's some net-specific CONFIG_DEBUG_ setting then that wold be a better thing to use. However the patch was a) wordwrapped, b) space-stuffed

[PATCH] Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL.

2011-01-06 Thread Rob Landley
From: Rob Landley rland...@parallels.com Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley rland...@parallels.com --- Saves about 3k from x86-64 defconfig according to scripts/bloat-o-meter. include/linux/rtnetlink.h |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL.

2011-01-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 02:13:38 -0600 Rob Landley rland...@parallels.com wrote: From: Rob Landley rland...@parallels.com Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley rland...@parallels.com --- Saves about 3k from x86-64 defconfig according to scripts/bloat-o-meter.