Hi,
On 2024/5/8 07:06, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Christian Brauner
[ Upstream commit 7af2ae1b1531feab5d38ec9c8f472dc6cceb4606 ]
When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
it will be mistaken for
Hi,
On 2024/5/8 07:09, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Christian Brauner
[ Upstream commit 7af2ae1b1531feab5d38ec9c8f472dc6cceb4606 ]
When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
it will be mistaken for
From: Christian Brauner
[ Upstream commit 7af2ae1b1531feab5d38ec9c8f472dc6cceb4606 ]
When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
it will be mistaken for fscache mode, and then attempt to free an
From: Christian Brauner
[ Upstream commit 7af2ae1b1531feab5d38ec9c8f472dc6cceb4606 ]
When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
it will be mistaken for fscache mode, and then attempt to free an
Hi David,
Hi Jeff,
Could you please take time to take a look at this series? I'd
appreciated it
if I could get some feedback and comments.
Thanks,
Baokun
On 2024/4/24 11:27, libao...@huaweicloud.com wrote:
From: Baokun Li
Hello everyone!
Recently we found some bugs while doing tests on
Hi Jingbo,
On 2024/5/6 11:09, Jingbo Xu wrote:
On 4/24/24 11:39 AM, libao...@huaweicloud.com wrote:
From: Baokun Li
Now every time the daemon reads an open request, it requests a new anon fd
and ondemand_id. With the introduction of "restore", it is possible to read
the same open request
Hi Jingbo,
Sorry for the late reply.
On 2024/5/6 13:50, Jingbo Xu wrote:
On 5/6/24 11:57 AM, Baokun Li wrote:
On 2024/5/6 11:48, Jingbo Xu wrote:
On 4/24/24 11:39 AM, libao...@huaweicloud.com wrote:
From: Baokun Li
This prevents concurrency from causing access to a freed req.
Could you
