On 2024/4/19 20:36, Baokun Li wrote:
Instead of allocating the erofs_sb_info in fill_super() allocate it during
erofs_init_fs_context() and ensure that erofs can always have the info
available during erofs_kill_sb(). After this erofs_fs_context is no longer
needed, replace ctx with sbi, no
On 2024/4/19 20:36, Baokun Li wrote:
Instead of allocating the erofs_sb_info in fill_super() allocate it during
erofs_init_fs_context() and ensure that erofs can always have the info
available during erofs_kill_sb(). After this erofs_fs_context is no longer
needed, replace ctx with sbi, no
On 2024/4/19 20:36, Baokun Li wrote:
Instead of allocating the erofs_sb_info in fill_super() allocate it during
erofs_init_fs_context() and ensure that erofs can always have the info
available during erofs_kill_sb(). After this erofs_fs_context is no longer
needed, replace ctx with sbi, no
On 4/22/24 7:31 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> Hi Jingbo,
>
> On 2024/4/22 18:25, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/24 8:36 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -761,12 +747,15 @@ static void erofs_free_dev_context(struct
>>> erofs_dev_context *devs)
>>> static void erofs_fc_free(struct fs_context *fc)
>>>
Hi Jingbo,
On 2024/4/22 18:25, Jingbo Xu wrote:
On 4/19/24 8:36 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
@@ -761,12 +747,15 @@ static void erofs_free_dev_context(struct
erofs_dev_context *devs)
static void erofs_fc_free(struct fs_context *fc)
{
- struct erofs_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
+
On 4/19/24 8:36 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> @@ -761,12 +747,15 @@ static void erofs_free_dev_context(struct
> erofs_dev_context *devs)
>
> static void erofs_fc_free(struct fs_context *fc)
> {
> - struct erofs_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
> + struct erofs_sb_info *sbi =
Instead of allocating the erofs_sb_info in fill_super() allocate it during
erofs_init_fs_context() and ensure that erofs can always have the info
available during erofs_kill_sb(). After this erofs_fs_context is no longer
needed, replace ctx with sbi, no functional changes.
Suggested-by: Jingbo Xu
