Hi Chao,
On 2019/2/18 9:43, Chao Yu wrote:
> Yes, you're right, I just missed some points...
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
>
Thanks for kindly reviewing, I can send this patch to the staging list later. :)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> Thanks,
Hi Chao,
On 2019/2/15 15:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/2/14 23:34, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> In real scenario, there could be several threads accessing xattrs
>> of the same xattr-uninitialized inode, and init_inode_xattrs()
>> almost at the same time.
>
> Yeah, nice catch!
>
>>
>> That's actually an
On 2019/2/14 23:34, Gao Xiang wrote:
> In real scenario, there could be several threads accessing xattrs
> of the same xattr-uninitialized inode, and init_inode_xattrs()
> almost at the same time.
Yeah, nice catch!
>
> That's actually an unexpected behavior, this patch closes the race.
>
>
In real scenario, there could be several threads accessing xattrs
of the same xattr-uninitialized inode, and init_inode_xattrs()
almost at the same time.
That's actually an unexpected behavior, this patch closes the race.
Fixes: b17500a0fdba ("staging: erofs: introduce xattr & acl support")
Cc:
