Hi Christian,
On 2024/3/7 17:17, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 12:18:52PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi,
(try to +Cc Christian and Al here...)
On 2024/3/7 11:41, Jingbo Xu wrote:
Hi Baokun,
Thanks for catching this!
On 3/7/24 10:52 AM, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Baokun,
On
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 12:18:52PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (try to +Cc Christian and Al here...)
>
> On 2024/3/7 11:41, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> > Hi Baokun,
> >
> > Thanks for catching this!
> >
> >
> > On 3/7/24 10:52 AM, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > Hi Baokun,
> > >
> > > On 2024/3/7 10:44,
On 2024/3/7 16:46, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:21:12AM +, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:06:49PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
+int erofs_anon_register_fs(void)
+{
+ return register_filesystem(_anon_fs_type);
+}
What for? The only thing it gives you is an ability
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:21:12AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:06:49PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> > > > +int erofs_anon_register_fs(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return register_filesystem(_anon_fs_type);
> > > > +}
> > > What for? The only thing it gives you is an
On 2024/3/7 15:21, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:06:49PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
+int erofs_anon_register_fs(void)
+{
+ return register_filesystem(_anon_fs_type);
+}
What for? The only thing it gives you is an ability to look it up by
name. Which is completely pointless,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:06:49PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> > > +int erofs_anon_register_fs(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return register_filesystem(_anon_fs_type);
> > > +}
> > What for? The only thing it gives you is an ability to look it up by
> > name. Which is completely pointless, IMO,
> The
On 2024/3/7 13:07, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 10:44:59AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
+static int erofs_anon_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
+{
+ fc->ops = _anon_context_ops;
+ return 0;
+}
ITYM
struct pseudo_fs_context *ctx = init_pseudo(fc,
Hi,
On 2024/3/7 14:46, Baokun Li wrote:
On 2024/3/7 11:41, Jingbo Xu wrote:
Hi Baokun,
...
Thank you for your feedback!
If I understand you correctly, you mean to remove erofs_pseudo_mnt
directly to avoid this false positive, and use anon_inode_create_getfile()
to create the required
On 2024/3/7 11:41, Jingbo Xu wrote:
Hi Baokun,
Thanks for catching this!
On 3/7/24 10:52 AM, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Baokun,
On 2024/3/7 10:44, Baokun Li wrote:
Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a
domain_id:
WARNING:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 10:44:59AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> +static int erofs_anon_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
> +{
> + fc->ops = _anon_context_ops;
> + return 0;
> +}
ITYM
struct pseudo_fs_context *ctx = init_pseudo(fc, EROFS_SUPER_MAGIC);
return ctx ? 0 :
Hi,
(try to +Cc Christian and Al here...)
On 2024/3/7 11:41, Jingbo Xu wrote:
Hi Baokun,
Thanks for catching this!
On 3/7/24 10:52 AM, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Baokun,
On 2024/3/7 10:44, Baokun Li wrote:
Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a
domain_id:
Hi Baokun,
Thanks for catching this!
On 3/7/24 10:52 AM, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Baokun,
>
> On 2024/3/7 10:44, Baokun Li wrote:
>> Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a
>> domain_id:
>>
>>
>> WARNING: possible recursive
Hi Xiang,
On 2024/3/7 10:52, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Baokun,
On 2024/3/7 10:44, Baokun Li wrote:
Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a
domain_id:
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Not
Hi Baokun,
On 2024/3/7 10:44, Baokun Li wrote:
Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a domain_id:
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Not tainted
14 matches
Mail list logo
