On 2024/4/24 13:59, Noboru Asai wrote:
Add missing block counting when the data to be inlined is not inlined.
---
v2:
- move from erofs_write_tail_end() to erofs_prepare_tail_block()
Signed-off-by: Noboru Asai
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Hi Xiang,
On 2024/4/24 12:29, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Baokun,
On 2024/4/24 11:34, libao...@huaweicloud.com wrote:
From: Jingbo Xu
Add missing lock protection in poll routine when iterating xarray,
otherwise:
Even with RCU read lock held, only the slot of the radix tree is
ensured to be pinned
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 07:31:32PM +0800, Yifan Zhao wrote:
> Currently fsck skips file extraction if it finds that EROFS_MAP_MAPPED
> is unset, which is not the case for chunk-based files with hole. This
> patch handles the corner case correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhao
I will apply the
Add missing block counting when the data to be inlined is not inlined.
---
v2:
- move from erofs_write_tail_end() to erofs_prepare_tail_block()
Signed-off-by: Noboru Asai
---
lib/inode.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/inode.c b/lib/inode.c
index cf22bbe..9aba69d 100644
On 2024/4/24 17:47, Ian Kent wrote:
On 23/4/24 18:34, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 2024/4/22 21:10, Ian Kent wrote:
On 22/4/24 17:12, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
(+Cc Jingbo here).
On 2024/4/22 16:31, Ian Kent wrote:
I'm new to the list so Hi to all,
I'm working with a heavily patched
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 02:15:58PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/4/24 13:59, Noboru Asai wrote:
> > Add missing block counting when the data to be inlined is not inlined.
> >
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - move from erofs_write_tail_end() to erofs_prepare_tail_block()
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
On 24/4/24 17:47, Ian Kent wrote:
On 23/4/24 18:34, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 2024/4/22 21:10, Ian Kent wrote:
On 22/4/24 17:12, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
(+Cc Jingbo here).
On 2024/4/22 16:31, Ian Kent wrote:
I'm new to the list so Hi to all,
I'm working with a heavily patched 5.14
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Baokun Li
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:
==
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in
On 4/24/24 4:42 PM, Hongbo Li wrote:
> When prepare_ondemand_read failed, wrong error message is printed.
> The prepare_read is also implemented in cachefiles, so we amend it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li
> ---
> fs/erofs/fscache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
On 23/4/24 18:34, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 2024/4/22 21:10, Ian Kent wrote:
On 22/4/24 17:12, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
(+Cc Jingbo here).
On 2024/4/22 16:31, Ian Kent wrote:
I'm new to the list so Hi to all,
I'm working with a heavily patched 5.14 kernel and I've gathered
together
On 2024/4/24 18:37, Ian Kent wrote:
On 24/4/24 17:47, Ian Kent wrote:
On 23/4/24 18:34, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 2024/4/22 21:10, Ian Kent wrote:
On 22/4/24 17:12, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Ian,
(+Cc Jingbo here).
On 2024/4/22 16:31, Ian Kent wrote:
I'm new to the list so Hi to all,
Hi Jia,
On 2024/4/24 22:55, Jia Zhu wrote:
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Baokun Li
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the
restore
command:
==
BUG: KASAN:
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Baokun Li
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:
==
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Baokun Li
This prevents concurrency from causing access to a freed req.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu
---
fs/cachefiles/daemon.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Baokun Li
The err_put_fd tag is only used once, so remove it to make the code more
readable.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu
---
fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4
Hi Gao,
Oh, sorry.
I knew to access i_blkaddr on uncompressed file, but it didn't occur
on the file system for testing, so I overlooked it.
I needed to be careful.
2024年4月24日(水) 19:38 Gao Xiang :
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 02:15:58PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2024/4/24 13:59,
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Baokun Li
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:
==
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Zizhi Wo
If copen is maliciously called in the user mode, it may delete the request
corresponding to the random id. And the request may have not been read yet.
Note that when the object is set to reopen, the open request will be done
在 2024/4/24 11:39, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Baokun Li
Replacing wait_for_completion() with wait_for_completion_killable() in
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req() allows us to kill processes that might
trigger a hunk_task if the daemon is abnormal.
But now only CACHEFILES_OP_READ is
Thanks for catching this. How about adding a Fixes tag.
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu
在 2024/4/24 11:34, libao...@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Hou Tao
When queuing ondemand_object_worker() to re-open the object,
cachefiles_object is not pinned. The cachefiles_object may be freed when
the pending read
ok, thanks!
On 2024/4/24 11:29, Gao Xiang wrote:
(+cc linux-erofs & LKML)
On 2024/4/24 10:39, Hongbo Li wrote:
When prepare_ondemand_read failed, wrong error message is printed.
The prepare_read is also implemented in cachefiles, so we amend it.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li
Reviewed-by: Gao
When prepare_ondemand_read failed, wrong error message is printed.
The prepare_read is also implemented in cachefiles, so we amend it.
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li
---
fs/erofs/fscache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/erofs/fscache.c
22 matches
Mail list logo
