Hello,
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/adsl/Publications/iron-sosp05.pdf
I think I got this link from OLS papers or from fs workshop ... and I really
like what it says.
How many of ixt3 features are going to be implemented in ext4?
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Oct 17, 2006 10:36 +0200, Jure Pečar wrote:
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/adsl/Publications/iron-sosp05.pdf
I think I got this link from OLS papers or from fs workshop ... and I really
like what it says.
How many of ixt3 features are going to be implemented in ext4?
None, yet. The journal
On Oct 17, 2006 11:06 +0200, Jure Pečar wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:51:30 -0600
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of the retry code has been looked at.
This is what I'm mostly interested in ... predictable, well behaving
and tested error handling recovery. Is ext4 going to
--- James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can submit it as your position paper, certainly.
It is not a position paper. There is too much SCSI
Architecture Model (SAM) in it. But from linux-scsi point of view
I guess it is.
However, the object of this event is not to collect a list of
