On Apr 30, 2007 08:09 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:09:42PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
I'd prefer that such functionality be integrated with Takashi's online
defrag tool, since it needs virtually the same functionality. For that
matter, this is also very similar
On Apr 30, 2007 11:22 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
One concern I still have is the fact that we're exposing a lot of
interfaces in libext2fs.so which are very specifically tied to the
current 48-bit physical/32-bit logical on-disk extent data structure.
If/when we add support for the 64/64-bit
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 16:36 +0530, Aneesh Kumar wrote:
On 4/24/07, Avantika Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ext4 Developer Interlock Call: 04/23/2007 Meeting Minutes
TESTING
- extents testing
- Discussed methods for testing extents on highly fragmented
filesystems.
- Jose
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:42AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Except one other issue with online shrinking is that we need to move
inodes on occasion and this poses a bunch of other problems over just
remapping the data blocks.
Well, I did say necessary, and not sufficient. But yes, moving
On 1 May 2007, at 15:20, David Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:39:06PM -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 14:22 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:44:01PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
This is actually for future use. Any flags that are added into
On May 01, 2007 11:05 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
Speaking of SCM's, how wedded is Clustrefs to mercurial? I've been
considering migrating e2fsprogs development to git, but one of the
reasons I haven't is because I was concerned that might be incovenient
for you folks.
Not at all, we just
On May 01, 2007 11:28 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:42AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Except one other issue with online shrinking is that we need to move
inodes on occasion and this poses a bunch of other problems over just
remapping the data blocks.
Well, I
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:52:49PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
I think rm -r does a LOT of this kind of operation, like:
stat(.); stat(foo); chdir(foo); stat(.); unlink(*); chdir(..); stat(.)
I think find does the same to avoid security problems with malicious
path manipulation.
Yep, so
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 01, 2007 14:22 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:44:01PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Hmm, I'd thought offline would migrate to EXTENT_UNKNOWN, but I didn't
I disagree - why would you want to
