looks like an error in error handling path (notice -28 (ENOSPC) before)
thanks for the report, Alex
Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
)
Simple test failed on ext4 when delayed allocation was used.
#mkfs.ext3 -b4096 /dev/vzvg/test2
#mount -text4dev /dev/vzvg/test2 /mnt/test -odelalloc
#fsstress -d /mnt/
OK
Mingming Cao wrote:
Run checkpatch.pl http://lwn.net/Articles/237451/
I fixed coding style issues for most patches by hand except the delayed
allocation patch ext4-delayed-allocation.patch. That need a bit more
work and requires someone family with the code better. Alex, can you
help on this
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:21:09AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> Yeah, it can run a subset of the tests on NFS and UDF filesystems as well and
> there are some specific UDF-only tests in it too. I think the NFS test group
> is mostly generic tests that don't use or test specific XFS features.
Act
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 03:22 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:50 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > > This patch adds a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version
> > > updates.
> >
> > Can you explain a bit more why w
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:31:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:57:59PM +0400, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> > Function prerform check for signgle region, with out respect to
> > segment nature of iovec, For example writev no longer works :)
>
> Btw, could someo
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:50 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > This patch adds a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version
> > updates.
>
> Can you explain a bit more why we need this mount option? Is it because
> of performance concern?
On Jun 14, 2007 13:50 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > This patch adds a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version
> > updates.
>
> Can you explain a bit more why we need this mount option? Is it because
> of performance concern?
Thi
On Jun 14, 2007 13:58 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > This patch converts the 32-bit i_version in the generic inode to a 64-
> > bit i_version field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Kalpak Sha
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> This patch converts the 32-bit i_version in the generic inode to a 64-
> bit
> i_version field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21/include/linux
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> This patch adds a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version
> updates.
Can you explain a bit more why we need this mount option? Is it because
of performance concern?
Mingming
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated the inode version patches and below are the details:
>
> 64-bit-i_version.patch which only replaces the 32-bit i_version field in
> the generic inode with a 64-bit i_version field. The VFS-level updates
> of the inode
On Jun 14, 2007 22:04 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:14:58AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > B FA_DEALLOCATE
> > > removes the underlying disk space with the given range. The disk space
> > > shall be removed regardless of it's contents so both allocated space
> > > fr
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:52:01PM +0530, Tejas Sumant wrote:
>
> Any idea, how to search a directory on given ext3 file system, which
> is having htree structure?
The same way you search any other Linux/Unix system. I.e., using
opendir()/readir() from a C program, or /bin/ls from a shell progra
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:57:59PM +0400, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> Function prerform check for signgle region, with out respect to
> segment nature of iovec, For example writev no longer works :)
Btw, could someone please start to collect all sniplets like this in
a nice simple regres
Andreas Dilger wrote:
Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I took out the i_version code from Kalpak's
ext4_expand_inode_extra_isize.patch.
http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git?a=blob;f=ext4_i_version_hi_2.patch;h=4519dd6540a78cadd235dad68248456d59c3384c;hb=8b956b5c5ccc3731f23fbce8d0
The updated series file.
# Rebased the patches to 2.6.22-rc4
# Add mount option to turn off extents
ext4_noextent_mount_opt.patch
# Mounted ext4dev fs with extents by default for testing purpose,
# for Ext4 product release, extents mount option
# will be turn on only if the fs has EXTENTS featur
The VFS-level updates of the inode version. These may not be necessary
since the i_version is being updated in ext4_mark_iloc_dirty().
Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
binfmt_misc.c |1 +
libfs.c |9 +
pipe.c|1 +
3 files changed, 11 in
This patch adds a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version
updates.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c |4 +++-
fs/ext4/super.c |6 +-
include/linux/ext4_fs.h |1 +
3 files c
This patch adds a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version
updates.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c |4 +++-
fs/ext4/super.c |6 +-
include/linux/ext4_fs.h |1 +
3 files c
ext4_i_version_hi_2.patch was still using ei->i_fs_version instead of
inode->i_version. I have corrected it.
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 15 ++-
include/linux/ext4_fs.h |4 +++-
2 fil
64-bit-i_version.patch which only replaces the 32-bit i_version field in
the generic inode with a 64-bit i_version field.
Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
P.S.
There were whitespace problems in i_version_hi.patch. I am attaching the
corrected patch.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
ext4_fs.h |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
This patch adds a 32-bit i_version_hi field to ext4_in
Hi,
I have updated the inode version patches and below are the details:
64-bit-i_version.patch which only replaces the 32-bit i_version field in
the generic inode with a 64-bit i_version field. The VFS-level updates
of the inode version are still in the i_version_update_vfs.patch and
this patch h
I just cant belive my eyes then i saw this at the first time...
simple test: strace dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/file
open("/dev/zero", O_RDONLY) = 0
close(1)= 0
open("/mnt/test/file", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 1
read(0, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 512)
Hi All,
Any idea, how to search a directory on given ext3 file system, which
is having htree structure?
Also is there any way to create a htree indexed directory explicitly?
using some command or tool?
Thanks
--
Tejas Sumant
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:14:58AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2007 09:52 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > B FA_PREALLOCATE
> > provides the same functionality as
> > B FA_ALLOCATE
> > except it does not ever change the file size. This allows allocation
> > of zero blocks beyond the e
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 13:43 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > ..
> > >
> > > > 5) ext3_write_end:
> > > > Before write_begin/write_end patch set we have folowing locking
> > > > order:
> > > > stop_journal(
Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I took out the i_version code from Kalpak's
> ext4_expand_inode_extra_isize.patch.
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git?a=blob;f=ext4_i_version_hi_2.patch;h=4519dd6540a78cadd235dad68248456d59c3384c;hb=8b956b5c5ccc3731f23fbce8d036b21f378fbdec
>
> A
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 13:43 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> ..
> >
> > > 5) ext3_write_end:
> > > Before write_begin/write_end patch set we have folowing locking
> > > order:
> > > stop_journal(handle);
> > > unlock_page(page);
> > > But now order is oposite:
> > >
On Jun 14, 2007 09:52 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> B FA_PREALLOCATE
> provides the same functionality as
> B FA_ALLOCATE
> except it does not ever change the file size. This allows allocation
> of zero blocks beyond the end of file and is useful for optimising
> append workloads.
> TP
> B FA_DEAL
Simple test failed on ext4 when delayed allocation was used.
#mkfs.ext3 -b4096 /dev/vzvg/test2
#mount -text4dev /dev/vzvg/test2 /mnt/test -odelalloc
#fsstress -d /mnt/test/ -l100 -n10 -p20 -f dwrite=0
EXT4-fs: writeback error = -28
..
EXT4-fs: writeback error = -28
Unable to handle ker
31 matches
Mail list logo
