Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable
changlog for
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 04:16:24PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2007 13:09 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > "dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1k ..." than to spin in a loop getting 16-bit
> > > random numbers from bash. We would also be at the mercy of the shell
> > > being identical on the user
On Jul 12, 2007 13:09 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > "dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1k ..." than to spin in a loop getting 16-bit
> > random numbers from bash. We would also be at the mercy of the shell
> > being identical on the user and debugger's systems.
>
> With /dev/urandom you have the guarantee yo
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:57:51 -0500 Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 12:38 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> +if (ext4_ext_check_header(inode,
> > >> ext_block_hdr(bh),
> > >> +
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:14:25 -0400
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:30:04AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> > Right now what I've done is allocate the bitmaps and inode tables at the
> > beginning of each group of 64 BG. Still need to work on fsck since just
> >
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:14:25 -0400
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:30:04AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> > Right now what I've done is allocate the bitmaps and inode tables at the
> > beginning of each group of 64 BG. Still need to work on fsck since just
> >
On Jul 12, 2007 13:56 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> As you suggest, let us just have two modes for the time being:
>
> #define FALLOC_ALLOCATE 0x1
> #define FALLOC_ALLOCATE_KEEP_SIZE 0x2
>
> As the name suggests, when FALLOC_ALLOCATE_KEEP_SIZE mode is passed it
> will r
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> >
> > Why don't we just merge the interface for preallocation (essentially
> > enough to satisfy posix_fallocate() and the simple XFS requirement for
> > space
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 12:38 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> + if (ext4_ext_check_header(inode, ext_block_hdr(bh),
> >> + depth - i - 1)) {
> >> + err = -EIO;
> >> +
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
>
> Why don't we just merge the interface for preallocation (essentially
> enough to satisfy posix_fallocate() and the simple XFS requirement for
> space reservation without changing file size), which there is clear agreement
>
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
>
> I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable
> changlog for those pa
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:32 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:01 -0400
> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch is on top of the nanosecond timestamp and i_version_hi
> > patches.
>
> This sort of information isn't needed (or desired) when this patch hits
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:22 -0400
> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> with the patch all headers are checked. the code should become
>> more resistant to on-disk corruptions. needless BUG_ON() have
>> been removed. please, review for inclusion.
>>
>> ...
>
>> @@
The next version of checkpatch.pl (0.08) should have support for a
number of the missed sylistics you mention. Will let them soak for a
bit to ensure we're not majorly regressing anything else.
-apw
ERROR: braces {} are not necessary for single statements
#4: FILE: Z11.c:1:
+if (EXT4_I(inode)->i
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:19:38PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2007 17:20 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > If you use a normal pseudo random number generator and print the seed
> > (e.g. create from the time) initially the image can be easily recreated
> > later without shipping it arou
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:16:50PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> > > Well, if you see the modes proposed using above flags :
> > >
> > > #define FA_ALLOCAT
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:16:50PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> > Well, if you see the modes proposed using above flags :
> >
> > #define FA_ALLOCATE 0
> > #define FA_DEALLOCATE FA_FL_DEALLOC
> > #define FA_RESV_SPACE
17 matches
Mail list logo
