On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:47 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
Peter, do you have any interest in seeing how far we can get
at tracking lock_page()? I'm not holding my breath, but any little bit
would probably help.
Would this be a valid report?
( /me goes hunt a x86_64 unwinder patch that will
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 15:02 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:47 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
Peter, do you have any interest in seeing how far we can get
at tracking lock_page()? I'm not holding my breath, but any little bit
would probably help.
Would this be a valid
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:02:23 +0200 Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:47 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
Peter, do you have any interest in seeing how far we can get
at tracking lock_page()? I'm not holding my breath, but any little bit
would probably help.
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 11:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:02:23 +0200 Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:47 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
Peter, do you have any interest in seeing how far we can get
at tracking lock_page()? I'm not
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:21:03 +0200 Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shows the current stacktrace where we violate the previously established
locking order.
yup, but the lock_page() which we did inside truncate_mutex was a
lock_page() against a different address_space: the blockdev
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:21:03 +0200 Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shows the current stacktrace where we violate the previously established
locking order.
yup, but the lock_page() which we did inside truncate_mutex was a
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:23:42AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
[CC += [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amit,
Hi Michael,
Thanks for this page. I will endeavour to review it in
the coming days. In the meantime, the better address to CC
me on fot man pages stuff is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure.
BTW,
Initial implementation of -fallocate for XFS.
Version 2:
o Make allocation and setting the file size atomic.
o Drop deallocate/punch functionality
o use mode field appropriately to determine if size needs changing.
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c | 47
FYI.
Initial support for fallocate-based pre-allocation in
xfs_io for testing. This currently only works on ia64 because
of the hard coded syscall number and will require autoconf
magic to conditionally compile in this support.
This allows simple command-line based testing of fallocate
based
