Re: [PATCH][RFC]JBD2: Fix journal checksum kernel oops on NUMA

2007-11-01 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Nov 01, 2007 17:40 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > Current journal checksumming patch failed fsstress test on NUMA. The > bh->b_data passed to the crc32_be () function could be NULL pointer, > which caused kernel oops immediately when running fsstress with -o > journal_checksum. It is because t

[PATCH][RFC]JBD2: Fix journal checksum kernel oops on NUMA

2007-11-01 Thread Mingming Cao
JBD2: Fix NULL pointer bh->b_data on NUMA box with journal checksumming. Current journal checksumming patch failed fsstress test on NUMA. The bh->b_data passed to the crc32_be () function could be NULL pointer, which caused kernel oops immediately when running fsstress with -o journal_checksum.

Re: + forbid-user-to-change-file-flags-on-quota-files.patch added to -mm tree

2007-11-01 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:55 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The patch titled > Forbid user to change file flags on quota files > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is > forbid-user-to-change-file-flags-on-quota-files.patch > > *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklis

Re: delalloc fragmenting files?

2007-11-01 Thread Eric Sandeen
Eric Sandeen wrote: > Alex Tomas wrote: >> please, try the patch attached. > > Looks quite a bit better: > > http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher/ext4-alex.png > http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher/ext4-alex-ext4-dd-write.png > http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher/ext4

+ forbid-user-to-change-file-flags-on-quota-files.patch added to -mm tree

2007-11-01 Thread akpm
The patch titled Forbid user to change file flags on quota files has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is forbid-user-to-change-file-flags-on-quota-files.patch *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/pat

Re: User permissions or UID/GIDs for portable disks?

2007-11-01 Thread Bram Neijt
Thanks to Dave and Eric for their replies. I'm moving the feature discussion to a higher level (pmount) and I've opened a blueprint on it[1] with more words on why I think it's a problem[2]. This means that I'm leaving this thread and closing it with this mail. I would like to thank everybody wh

Re: delalloc fragmenting files?

2007-11-01 Thread Eric Sandeen
Alex Tomas wrote: > please, try the patch attached. Looks quite a bit better: http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher/ext4-alex.png http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher/ext4-alex-ext4-dd-write.png http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher/ext4-alex-ext4-xfs-dd-write.png It is

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [RFC PATCH ext3/ext4] orphan list corruption due bad inode]

2007-11-01 Thread Andreas Dilger
I just noticed this patch in the old parts of my inbox, but it was never landed to ext3 or ext4. - Forwarded message from Vasily Averin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:19:10 +0400 From: Vasily Averin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,

Re: [PATCH 13/13][e2fsprogs] Add m_uninit test case.

2007-11-01 Thread Coly Li
Jose R. Santos wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:03:00 -0500 > "Jose R. Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It seems like a problem on your end since I got the patches from the >> mailing list after sending them. Here are the patches from the >> archives. >> >> [PATCH 01/13] http://lists.openwall.n

Re: [PATCH 13/13][e2fsprogs] Add m_uninit test case.

2007-11-01 Thread Coly Li
Jose R. Santos wrote: > On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:58:42 +0800 > Coly Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Coly Li wrote: >>> I plan to do some work based on uninit group patch. When I try to patch the >>> patch into kernel, I >>

Re: [PATCH 13/13][e2fsprogs] Add m_uninit test case.

2007-11-01 Thread Jose R. Santos
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:03:00 -0500 "Jose R. Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems like a problem on your end since I got the patches from the > mailing list after sending them. Here are the patches from the > archives. > > [PATCH 01/13] http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2007/10/11/20 >

Re: [PATCH 13/13][e2fsprogs] Add m_uninit test case.

2007-11-01 Thread Jose R. Santos
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:58:42 +0800 Coly Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Coly Li wrote: > > I plan to do some work based on uninit group patch. When I try to patch the > > patch into kernel, I > > sorry

Re: [PATCH 13/13][e2fsprogs] Add m_uninit test case.

2007-11-01 Thread Coly Li
Coly Li wrote: > I plan to do some work based on uninit group patch. When I try to patch the > patch into kernel, I sorry it's typo, I mean into e2fsprogs... > find the sequence number of patch is not c

Re: [PATCH 13/13][e2fsprogs] Add m_uninit test case.

2007-11-01 Thread Coly Li
I plan to do some work based on uninit group patch. When I try to patch the patch into kernel, I find the sequence number of patch is not continuous. Here is what I find for e2fsprogs patch, [PATCH 00/13] [PATCH 02/13] [PATCH 03/13] [PATCH 04/13] [PATCH 05/13] [PATCH 06/13] [PATCH 07/13] [PATCH