On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> Btw: Nick's patches broke LO_CRYPT_XOR mode,
It would help him if you could describe how.
> but it is ok because
> this feature was absolete and not used by anyone, am i right here?
I know nothing of this; but so long as its code remains in the dri
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> loop.c code itself is not perfect. In fact before Nick's patch
> partial write was't possible. Assumption what write chunks are
> always page aligned is realy weird ( see "index++" line).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Monakhov <[EMAIL
se of more ifdefs).
Likewise don't set the XATTR_USER flag when built without XATTR support.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext2/super.c |4
fs/ext3/super.c |4
fs/ext4/super.c |4
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
--- 2.6.20-rc5/fs/
efault
mode on symlinks (always 0777) assumed VFS applies umask: which it does,
unless the mount is marked for ACLs; but ext[234] set MS_POSIXACL in
s_flags according to s_mount_opt set according to def_mount_opts.
We could revert to the 2.6.10 ext[234]_init_acl (adding an S_ISLNK test);
but other files
xt to find
> out what to do about this
>
> --
> Subject: ext3 balloc: fix _with_rsv freeze
> From: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> After several days of testing ext3 with reservations, it got caught inside
> e
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Port a series ext2 balloc patches from Hugh to ext3/4. The first 6
> patches are against ext3, and the rest are aginst ext4.
Thanks for all that, Mingming:
whichever is appropriate, all twelve
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
or
S
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 16:19 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > After four days of running, the EM64T has at last reproduced the same
> > hang as it did in an hour before: stuck in
> > ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv,
> > rep
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:40 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > After several days of testing ext2 with reservations, it got caught inside
> > ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv: alloc_new_reservation repeatedly succeeding
> > on th
grp_goal 0 is a genuine goal (unlike -1),
so ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv should treat it as such.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext2/balloc.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- 2.6.19-rc6-mm2/fs/ext2/balloc.c 2006-11-24
The reservations tree is an rb_tree not a list, so it's less confusing to
use rb_entry() than list_entry() - though they're both just container_of().
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext2/balloc.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletion
found 00).
Is this a problem for mainline ext2? No, because the "size" in its memscan
is always EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb), which mkfs.ext2 requires to be a
multiple of 8. Is this a problem for ext3 or ext4? No, because they have
an additional extN_test_allocatable test which rescues t
rsv_end is the last block within the reservation,
so alloc_new_reservation should accept start_block == rsv_end as success.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext2/balloc.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 2.6.19-rc6-mm2/fs/ext2/balloc.c
ext2_new_blocks has a nice io_error label for setting -EIO,
so goto that in the one place that doesn't already use it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ext2/balloc.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- 2.6.19-rc6-mm2/fs/ex
ext2_new_blocks should reset the reservation window size to 0 when squeezing
the last blocks out of an almost full filesystem, so the retry doesn't skip
any groups with less than half that free, reporting ENOSPC too soon.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ex
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:49:20 -0800
> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That does not explain the repeated reservation window add and remove
> > behavior Huge has reported.
>
> I spent quite some time comparing with ext3. I'm a bit stumped
15 matches
Mail list logo
