On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 21:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:09:41PM +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
> > Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:43:40AM +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
> >>> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> What about this ? I guess we will ove
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:09:41PM +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:43:40AM +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
>>> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
What about this ? I guess we will overflow start = start << bsbits;
>>> Hi Aneesh,
>>> your patch bel
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:43:40AM +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
What about this ? I guess we will overflow start = start << bsbits;
Hi Aneesh,
your patch below doesn't fix the issue, because as start_off is also
loff_t, start_off = ac->ac_o_
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:43:40AM +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> What about this ? I guess we will overflow start = start << bsbits;
>>
>
> Hi Aneesh,
> your patch below doesn't fix the issue, because as start_off is also
> loff_t, start_off = ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:43:40AM +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> What about this ? I guess we will overflow start = start << bsbits;
>>
>
> Hi Aneesh,
> your patch below doesn't fix the issue, because as start_off is also
> loff_t, start_off = ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
What about this ? I guess we will overflow
start = start << bsbits;
Hi Aneesh,
your patch below doesn't fix the issue, because as start_off is also
loff_t, start_off = ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical << bsbits also overflows.
I guess start should be of type loff_t. Patch
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:48:27AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:11 +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
> > A simple dd oopses the kernel (2.6.24-rc7 with the latest patch queue):
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test/foo bs=1M count=8096
> >
> > EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
> > ---
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:11 +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
> A simple dd oopses the kernel (2.6.24-rc7 with the latest patch queue):
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test/foo bs=1M count=8096
>
> EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
> [ cut here ]
> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3148!
>
>
A simple dd oopses the kernel (2.6.24-rc7 with the latest patch queue):
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test/foo bs=1M count=8096
EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3148!
The BUG_ON is:
BUG_ON(size <= 0 || size >= EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(
