On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:50:04 -0400
Mingming Caoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the ext4 patch queue is in good shape now.
Which ext4 patches are you intending to merge into 2.6.23?
Please send all those out to lkml for review?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:29:21AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >In any case, the plan is to push all of the core bits into Linus tree
> >for 2.6.22 once it opens up, which should be Real Soon Now, it looks
> >like.
>
> Presumably you mean 2.6.23.
Yes, sorry. I meant once Linus releases 2.6.22, a
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:33:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Please let us know what you think of Mingming's suggestion of posting
all the fallocate patches including the ext4 ones as incremental ones
against the -mm.
I think Mingming was asking that Ted move the
Theodore Tso wrote:
I don't think we have a problem here. What we have now is fine, and
It's fine for ext4, but not the wider world. This is a common problem
created by parallel development when code dependencies exist.
In any case, the plan is to push all of the core bits into Linus tre
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:33:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Please let us know what you think of Mingming's suggestion of posting
> > all the fallocate patches including the ext4 ones as incremental ones
> > against the -mm.
>
> I think Mingming was asking that Ted move the current quilt tr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:33:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I think Mingming was asking that Ted move the current quilt tree into git,
> presumably because she's working off git.
>
> I'm not sure what to do, really. The core kernel patches need to be in
> Ted's tree for testing but that'll c
On Jun 28, 2007 23:27 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:55:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Are we all supposed to re-review the entire patchset (or at least #4 and
> > #7) again?
>
> As I mentioned in the note above, only patches #4 and #7 were new and
> thus these nee
Andrew Morton wrote:
b) We do what we normally don't do and reserve the syscall slots in mainline.
If everyone agrees it's going to happen... why not?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More major
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 11:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:27:57 +0530 "Amit K. Arora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Please drop the non-ext4 patches from the ext4 tree and send incremental
> > > patches against the (non-ext4) fallocate patches in -mm.
> >
> > Please le
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:27:57 +0530 "Amit K. Arora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please drop the non-ext4 patches from the ext4 tree and send incremental
> > patches against the (non-ext4) fallocate patches in -mm.
>
> Please let us know what you think of Mingming's suggestion of posting
> all t
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:55:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:58:10 +0530 "Amit K. Arora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > N O T E:
> > ---
> > 1) Only Patches 4/7 and 7/7 are NEW. Rest of them are _already_ part
> >of ext4 patch queue git tree hosted by Ted.
>
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 02:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Please drop the non-ext4 patches from the ext4 tree and send incremental
> patches against the (non-ext4) fallocate patches in -mm.
>
The ext4 fallocate() patches are dependent on the core fallocate()
patches, so ext4 patch-queue and git t
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:58:10 +0530 "Amit K. Arora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> N O T E:
> ---
> 1) Only Patches 4/7 and 7/7 are NEW. Rest of them are _already_ part
>of ext4 patch queue git tree hosted by Ted.
Why the heck are replacements for these things being sent out again when
they
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 06:58:10PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> 2) The above new patches (4/7 and 7/7) are based on the dicussion
>between Andreas Dilger and David Chinner on the mode argument,
>when later posted a man page on fallocate.
Can you include the man page in this patch set, ple
N O T E:
---
1) Only Patches 4/7 and 7/7 are NEW. Rest of them are _already_ part
of ext4 patch queue git tree hosted by Ted.
2) The above new patches (4/7 and 7/7) are based on the dicussion
between Andreas Dilger and David Chinner on the mode argument,
when later posted a man page o
15 matches
Mail list logo
