On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:15:00PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:25:32AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
+static int free_ext_idx(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
+ struct ext4_extent_idx *ix)
+{
+ int i, retval = 0;
+
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:02:15 -0500 Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The below patch add ioctl for migrating ext3 indirect block mapped inode
to ext4 extent mapped inode.
This patch adds lots of weird and inexplicable single- and double-newlines
in inappropriate places. However it
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The below patch add ioctl for migrating ext3 indirect block mapped inode
to ext4 extent mapped inode.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/ext4/Makefile|2 +-
fs/ext4/ioctl.c |3 +
fs/ext4/migrate.c |
The below patch add ioctl for migrating ext3 indirect block mapped inode
to ext4 extent mapped inode.
The patch is work in progress and have the below FIXME!!
1)Make sure the locking is correct with respect to
a) Already open references attempting a read on the file
b) mmap
On Jun 12, 2007 12:17 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The below patch add ioctl for migrating ext3 indirect block mapped inode
to ext4 extent mapped inode.
How does this relate to the migrate ioctl used by Takashi in the current
ext4 defragmenter patch series? Ideally, the code shouldn't
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007 12:17 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The below patch add ioctl for migrating ext3 indirect block mapped inode
to ext4 extent mapped inode.
How does this relate to the migrate ioctl used by Takashi in the current
ext4 defragmenter patch series?
You
