Re: Correction to nanosecond timestamp patch for 64-bit arch

2007-06-18 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 18:32 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: Index: linux-2.6.21/include/linux/ext4_fs.h === --- linux-2.6.21.orig/include/linux/ext4_fs.h +++ linux-2.6.21/include/linux/ext4_fs.h @@ -366,9 +366,9 @@ static inline __le32

Re: Correction to nanosecond timestamp patch for 64-bit arch

2007-06-18 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jun 18, 2007 15:39 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 18:32 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: Index: linux-2.6.21/include/linux/ext4_fs.h === --- linux-2.6.21.orig/include/linux/ext4_fs.h +++

Correction to nanosecond timestamp patch for 64-bit arch

2007-06-17 Thread Kalpak Shah
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079 mentions the problem with timestamps in ext2/3/4. If the timestamp is set to before epoch, the files have their dates changed on 64-bit partitions. The corrections from this bug also need to be incorporated in the nanosecond patch.