On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:40:25 -0500
"Jose R. Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I really want to use seekwatcher to test some of the stuff that
> > > I'm doing for flex_bg feature but it barfs on me in my test
> > > machine.
> > >
> > > running :sleep 10:
> > > done running sleep 10
>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:43:55 -0400
Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2) You mentioned that one of the goals of the benchmark is to measure
> > locality during directory aging, but the workloads seems too well
> > order to truly age the filesystem. At least that's what I can gather
>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:34:49 -0500
"Jose R. Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:31:04 -0400
> Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I recently posted some performance numbers for Btrfs with different
> > blocksizes, and to help establish a b
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:31:04 -0400
Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I recently posted some performance numbers for Btrfs with different
> blocksizes, and to help establish a baseline I did comparisons with
> Ext3.
>
> The graphs, numbers and a basic description of com
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:31:04 -0400
Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I recently posted some performance numbers for Btrfs with different
> blocksizes, and to help establish a baseline I did comparisons with
> Ext3.
>
> The graphs, numbers and a basic description of com
Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:53 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get this error while running compilebench
http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/compilebench/compilebench-0.4.tar.bz2
I've uploaded compilebench-0.6.tar.bz2 and updated the docs on the
compileben
I get this error while running compilebench
http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/compilebench/compilebench-0.4.tar.bz2
elm3b138:~/compilebench-0.4# ./compilebench -d /ext4/
using working directory /ext4/, 30 intial dirs 100 runs
native unpatched native-0 222MB in 9.17 seconds (24.25 MB/s)
native p
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:53 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I get this error while running compilebench
>
> http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/compilebench/compilebench-0.4.tar.bz2
I've uploaded compilebench-0.6.tar.bz2 and updated the docs on the
compilebench page. This i
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:12:58 -0700
Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 19:31 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I recently posted some performance numbers for Btrfs with different
> > blocksizes, and to help establish a baseline I did comparisons wit
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 19:31 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I recently posted some performance numbers for Btrfs with different
> blocksizes, and to help establish a baseline I did comparisons with
> Ext3.
>
Thanks for doing this, Chris!
> The graphs, numbers and a basic descrip
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:31:04 -0400
Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did expect delayed allocation to help the write phases of
> compilebench, especially the parts where it writes out .o files in
> random order (basically writing medium sized files all over the
> directory tree). But, e
Hello everyone,
I recently posted some performance numbers for Btrfs with different
blocksizes, and to help establish a baseline I did comparisons with
Ext3.
The graphs, numbers and a basic description of compilebench are here:
http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/blocksizes/
Ext3 easily wins the read
12 matches
Mail list logo
