Hi,
yes, it's absolutely safe to remove. I just wanted to see how many
collisions happen in "real life".
On 9/14/07, Aneesh Kumar K.V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >
> > I checked the logs today for the fsstress run i found this in my dmesg
> > log. The
> > s
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:59:26 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have updated the mballoc patches.
Has anyone reviewed this stuff? I don't see much evidence of it here?
Just a quick scan shows up heavy over-inlining, many
macros-which-should-be-funct
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:59:26 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have updated the mballoc patches.
Has anyone reviewed this stuff? I don't see much evidence of it here?
Just a quick scan shows up heavy over-inlining, many
macros-which-should-be-functions and numerous needles
Hi Alex,
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I checked the logs today for the fsstress run i found this in my dmesg
log. The
same stack trace is repeated for many times
uh! busy PA
Call Trace:
[c000efa72fc0] [c000fe30] .show_stack+0x6c/0x1a0 (unreliable)
[c000efa73060] [c01954a0
I checked the logs today for the fsstress run i found this in my dmesg log. The
same stack trace is repeated for many times
uh! busy PA
Call Trace:
[c000efa72fc0] [c000fe30] .show_stack+0x6c/0x1a0 (unreliable)
[c000efa73060] [c01954a0]
.ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocati
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 23:29 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Valerie,
>
>
> Valerie Clement wrote:
> > Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>
> >> running fsstress on ppc64 give me
> >> EXT4-fs: group 9: 16384 blocks in bitmap, 32254 in gd
> >> EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used: Allo
Valerie,
Valerie Clement wrote:
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
running fsstress on ppc64 give me
EXT4-fs: group 9: 16384 blocks in bitmap, 32254 in gd
EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used: Allocating
block in system zone - block = 294915
EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_ext_
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 13:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> I have updated the mballoc patches. The same can be found at
>
> http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/
>
>
>
> The series file is
>
> # This series applies on GIT commit b07d68b5ca4d55a16fab223d63d5fb36f89ff42f
> ext4-j
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I have updated the mballoc patches. The same can be found at
http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/
Test status:
Minor testing with KVM. I also didn't do a PPC build.
running fsstress on ppc64 give me
EXT4-fs: group 9: 16384 blocks in bitmap, 3225
I have updated the mballoc patches. The same can be found at
http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/
The series file is
# This series applies on GIT commit b07d68b5ca4d55a16fab223d63d5fb36f89ff42f
ext4-journal_chksum-2.6.20.patch
ext4-journal-chksum-review-fix.patch
ext4_uninit_b
10 matches
Mail list logo