Hi Chao,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:12:36AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> f2fs support atomic write with following semantics:
> 1. open db file
> 2. ioctl start atomic write
> 3. (write db file) * n
> 4. ioctl commit atomic write
> 5. close db file
>
> With this flow we can avoid file becoming
Hi Chao,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:26:53PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 6:54 AM
> > To: Chao Yu
> > Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 8:05 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support revoking atomic written pages
>
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 7:32 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs:
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 7:32 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs:
Introduce a macro named F2FS_MAX_BLOCKS to indicate maximum block index
in f2fs, it could be used to avoid unneeded calculation in runtime.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 -
fs/f2fs/super.c | 19
On 2015/12/22 11:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> It would be better to use atomic variable for total_extent_tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> ---
> fs/f2fs/debug.c| 5 +++--
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 8
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/node.c