Overview
This patch introduces a new way to preference data sections when selecting
GC victims. Migration of data blocks causes invalidation of node blocks.
Therefore, in situations where GC is frequent, selecting data blocks as
victims can reduce unnecessary block migration by invalidati
In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:
VAR + value < VAR
Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_o
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_o
From: Jaegeuk Kim
[ Upstream commit 9dad4d964291295ef48243d4e03972b85138bc9f ]
1. do roll forward recovery
2. update current segments pointers
3. fix the entire zones' write pointers
4. do checkpoint
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
fs/f2fs/
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_o
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 4961acdd65c956e97c1a000c82d91a8c1cdbe44b ]
It needs to add missing gcing flag on page during block migration,
in order to garantee migrated data be persisted during checkpoint,
otherwise out-of-order persistency between data and node may cause
data corruption afte
From: Jaegeuk Kim
[ Upstream commit 9dad4d964291295ef48243d4e03972b85138bc9f ]
1. do roll forward recovery
2. update current segments pointers
3. fix the entire zones' write pointers
4. do checkpoint
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
fs/f2fs/
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_o
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 4961acdd65c956e97c1a000c82d91a8c1cdbe44b ]
It needs to add missing gcing flag on page during block migration,
in order to garantee migrated data be persisted during checkpoint,
otherwise out-of-order persistency between data and node may cause
data corruption afte
From: Jaegeuk Kim
[ Upstream commit 9dad4d964291295ef48243d4e03972b85138bc9f ]
1. do roll forward recovery
2. update current segments pointers
3. fix the entire zones' write pointers
4. do checkpoint
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
fs/f2fs/
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_o
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 4961acdd65c956e97c1a000c82d91a8c1cdbe44b ]
It needs to add missing gcing flag on page during block migration,
in order to garantee migrated data be persisted during checkpoint,
otherwise out-of-order persistency between data and node may cause
data corruption afte
From: Jaegeuk Kim
[ Upstream commit 9dad4d964291295ef48243d4e03972b85138bc9f ]
1. do roll forward recovery
2. update current segments pointers
3. fix the entire zones' write pointers
4. do checkpoint
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
fs/f2fs/
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_o
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 4961acdd65c956e97c1a000c82d91a8c1cdbe44b ]
It needs to add missing gcing flag on page during block migration,
in order to garantee migrated data be persisted during checkpoint,
otherwise out-of-order persistency between data and node may cause
data corruption afte
From: Chao Yu
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_o
From: Jaegeuk Kim
[ Upstream commit 9dad4d964291295ef48243d4e03972b85138bc9f ]
1. do roll forward recovery
2. update current segments pointers
3. fix the entire zones' write pointers
4. do checkpoint
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
fs/f2fs/
18 matches
Mail list logo
