From: Yunlei He
GC move fbe data block will add some non uptodate page, we'd
better release it at the end.
Signed-off-by: Yunlei He
Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang
---
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index 8abf521530ff..09b65e6ea8
On Fri, 07 Nov 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 07:07 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 08:23 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > On Thu, 06 Nov 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > Since ce8644fcadc5 ("lookup_open(): expand the call of vfs_create()"),
> > > > the "excl" arg
On 2025-11-06, John Ogness wrote:
>> I think that we should do the following:
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> index 839f504db6d3..78e02711872e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.
On 2025-11-06, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> index 839f504db6d30..8499ee642c31d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> @@ -390,6 +390,17 @@ static unsigned int
On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 07:07 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 08:23 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Nov 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > Since ce8644fcadc5 ("lookup_open(): expand the call of vfs_create()"),
> > > the "excl" argument to the ->create() inode_operation is always
On Thu 2025-11-06 12:42:21, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2025-11-05, John Ogness wrote:
> >> Another question is whether this is the only problem caused the patch.
> >
> > This comparison is quite special. It caught my attention while combing
> > through the code.
>
> The reason that this comparison i
On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 08:23 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Since ce8644fcadc5 ("lookup_open(): expand the call of vfs_create()"),
> > the "excl" argument to the ->create() inode_operation is always set to
> > true. Remove it, and fix up all of the create imple
On 2025-11-05, John Ogness wrote:
>> Another question is whether this is the only problem caused the patch.
>
> This comparison is quite special. It caught my attention while combing
> through the code.
The reason that this comparison is special is because it is the only one
that does not take wr
From: Yongpeng Yang
sbi->unusable_blocks_per_sec is used only within CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
sections, except for CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC and CAP_SEGS_PER_SEC. This patch
renames unusable_blocks_per_sec to unusable_blocks_per_blkz and ensures
that unusable_blocks_per_blkz is properly enclosed within the
CO
From: Yongpeng Yang
When the block device reports max_open_zones == 0, sbi->max_open_zones
is initialized to UINT_MAX. In such cases, F2FS can still be mounted
successfully (as tested under qemu).
However, for SSDs, a device reporting max_open_zones == 0 should not be
mountable, while for SMR HDD
10 matches
Mail list logo