1ea1f212c6636f231d6d2771
[5/5] block: remove gfp_flags from blkdev_zone_mgmt
commit: 71f4ecdbb42addf82b01b734b122a02707fed521
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lis
5c55430a5674b32ad0d9e57a8ec251
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
n linux-next as well? Thanks!
For the block bits:
Acked-by: Jens Axboe
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
On 6/20/23 12:16?AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 06/19, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I came across this patch in a news posting:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev=d618126911829523e35a61f4a5a4ad159b1b2c8d
>>
>
iomap, or IOCB_NOWAIT is
handled by generic_perform_write() and below.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
49a8ce78ef014a71b05157a43fba8dc764e3
[30/30] fs: remove the now unused FMODE_* flags
commit: 0733ad8002916b9dbbbcfe6e92ad44d2657de1c1
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
arity helper
commit: 7b47ef52d0a2025fd1408a8a0990933b8e1e510f
[26/27] block: decouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD
commit: 44abff2c0b970ae3d310b97617525dc01f248d7c
[27/27] direct-io: remove random prefetches
commit: c22198e78d523c8fa079bbb70b2523bb6aa51849
B
leanups
> branch?
I have tentatively done so, let me know you prefer doing it differently.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
ches can go through the
> respective trees proving the final patch doesn't land until after they
> all do - so maybe it should be held for 5.18-rc2 if all the rest lands
> by 5.18-rc1.
For the series:
Acked-by: Jens Axboe
--
Jens Axboe
___
L
On 11/10/21 12:08 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/09, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/9/21 9:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 06:13:36PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> This patch adds a way to attach HIPRI by expanding the existing sysfs's
>&
uld only be used when explicitly specified by
> the submitter of the I/O.
Yes, this cannot be set in the middle for a multitude of reasons. I wonder
if we should add a comment to that effect near the definition of it.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel
e 5.15
drivers branch anyway.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
/*
> - * 8 best effort priority levels are supported
> + * The RT and BE priority classes both support up to 8 priority levels.
> */
> -#define IOPRIO_BE_NR 8
> +#define IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS 8
That might not be a good idea, if an application alrea
t; - * Fallback BE priority
> + * Fallback BE priority level.
> */
> -#define IOPRIO_NORM 4
> +#define IOPRIO_BE_NORM 4
This again seems like a very poor idea.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux
ine to me. A better commit title
would do wonders too, though, it's very non-descript.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
On 1/26/21 7:52 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> this series contains various cleanups for how bios are allocated or
> initialized plus related fallout.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linu
-parter:
1) Use the inode blkbits where appropriate
2) Then do this change
I'm leaning towards just doing it in blksize_bits() instead of updating
every caller, unless there aren't that many left once we've gone
through patch 1.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
ge is
handwavy at best.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
ince patches 6-12 depend on them. Then patches 6-12 can go upstream
> via
> the SCSI and fscrypt trees in the following release.
I have applied 1-5 for 5.8. Small tweak needed in patch 3 due to a header
inclusion, but clean apart from that.
--
Jens Axboe
_
gt; series for inclusion in the 5.5 kernel.
We're taking branching to new levels... I created for-5.5/zoned for this,
which is for-5.5/block + for-5.5/drivers + for-5.5/drivers-post combined.
The latter is a branch with the SCSI dependencies from Martin pulled in.
--
Jens Axboe
__
the bio even more. At least the Google
approach didn't include bio iter changes as well.
Please work it out between yourselves so we can have a single, clean
abstraction that works for both.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing l
; +static inline u64 bio_crypt_data_unit_num(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return 0;
> +}
And this one definitely needs to go.
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> index 95202f80676c..0b794fe3530a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk_
On 7/11/19 8:05 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/7/19 8:02 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2019/07/01 14:09, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> This series addresses a recuring problem with zone revalidation
>>> failures observed during extensive testing with memory constraine
s, Martin,
>
> Any comment regarding this series ?
LGTM, I'll queue it up for this release.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
first two pages on loop file
> 2) LOOP_SET_STATUS64 changes the offset on the loop file
> 3) mount is failed due to the cached pages having wrong superblock
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.
On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch makes dm be aware of io_pages to assign sane req_size for reads.
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
ht
On 10/16/18 1:31 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/16, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 1:23 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Thanks Jens,
>>>
>>> On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
>>> the idle time by the internal accou
t's what got us into trouble in the first place. Can I add
your acked-by or review-by to the other patch, then?
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
On 10/16/18 10:06 AM, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On 2018-10-16 22:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> This doesn't work on stacked devices, and it doesn't work on
>> blk-mq devices. The request_list is only used on legacy, which
>> we don't have much of anymore, and soon wo
This doesn't work on stacked devices, and it doesn't work on
blk-mq devices. The request_list is only used on legacy, which
we don't have much of anymore, and soon won't have any of.
Kill the check.
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
---
fs
30 matches
Mail list logo
