Hi, Fan,
On 2016/3/1 13:58, Fan Li wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Junling Zheng [mailto:zhengjunl...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:34 PM
>> To: Fan Li; 'Jaegeuk Kim'
>> Cc: heyun...@huawei.com; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.s
Correctly calculate the total FS size in init_sb_info(), for sector
size may not be 512 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunl...@huawei.com>
---
fsck/mount.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
index 4c807f9..7f4b85a
Correctly calculate the total FS size in init_sb_info, for sector
size may not be 512 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunl...@huawei.com>
---
fsck/mount.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
index 4c807f9..3adaa8a
Hi, Fan,
On 2016/2/24 15:57, Fan Li wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 12:08 PM
>> To: Fan Li
>> Cc: 'Junling Zheng'; heyun...@huawei.com;
>> linux-f2fs-devel@l
methods and redefine MAX_SIT_BITMAP_SIZE
to prevent sit_ver_bitmap_bytesize overflowing.
Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunl...@huawei.com>
---
include/f2fs_fs.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/f2fs_fs.h b/include/f2fs_fs.h
index b58aa74..3
F2FS can support 16T bytes at most. Limit the config.total_sectors
so that most parameters calculated according to it in sb/cp can be
limited correctly too.
Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunl...@huawei.com>
---
lib/libf2fs.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git
Hi Chao,
On 2016/2/23 17:46, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Junling,
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Junling Zheng [mailto:zhengjunl...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:20 PM
>> To: Chao Yu; jaeg...@kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourc
On 2016/2/23 13:28, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Junling Zheng [mailto:zhengjunl...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 11:47 AM
>> To: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; jaeg...@kernel.org
>> Subject:
from
segment_count_sit in f2fs_write_check_point_pack() being over
MAX_SIT_BITMAP_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunl...@huawei.com>
---
mkfs/f2fs_format.c | 23 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c b/mkfs/f2fs_fo
On 2016/2/23 1:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Junling,
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:59:04PM +0800, Junling Zheng wrote:
>> In most cases, sit_bitmap_size is smaller than MAX_SIT_BITMAP_SIZE.
>>
>> However, in some extreme scenarios, such as 16TB, sit_bitmap_s
from
segment_count_sit in f2fs_write_check_point_pack() being over
MAX_SIT_BITMAP_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunl...@huawei.com>
---
mkfs/f2fs_format.c | 24 +---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
On 2016/2/3 13:29, Fan Li wrote:
> Now f2fs will check statistics recorded in super block in
> sanity_check_area_boundary() during mount,if number of segments per
> section is greater than 1, and the disk space isn't aligned with section,
Hi Fan, Hi Kim:
I'm uncertain about which unit the disk
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
