On 2019/7/29 13:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 07/23, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/7/23 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 07/16, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2019/5/9 9:15, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/5/5 10:51, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/29,
On 07/23, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/7/23 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/16, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2019/5/9 9:15, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2019/5/5 10:51, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2019-4-28
On 2019/7/23 9:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 07/16, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2019/5/9 9:15, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2019/5/5 10:51, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/24,
On 07/16, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2019/5/9 9:15, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2019/5/5 10:51, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> This patch fixes to
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2019/5/9 9:15, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/5/5 10:51, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
On 2019/5/5 10:51, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
> there are features kernel can not recognize,
On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
there are features kernel can not recognize, just fail the mount.
>>>
>>> We need to
On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
> >> there are features kernel can not recognize, just fail the mount.
> >
> > We need to figure out per-feature-based rejection,
Hi Chao and Jaegeuk,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:49 PM Chao Yu wrote:
>
> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
> there are features kernel can not recognize, just fail the mount.
>
Surprised to see that this wasn't implemented yet.
I was actually about to suggest this
On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
>> there are features kernel can not recognize, just fail the mount.
>
> We need to figure out per-feature-based rejection, since some of them can
> be set without
On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
> there are features kernel can not recognize, just fail the mount.
We need to figure out per-feature-based rejection, since some of them can
be set without layout change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
