> I think it's unclear from the orangefs source code what the intention is,
> as there is a mixed of signed and unsigned types used for the inode
> stamps:
>
> #define encode_PVFS_time encode_int64_t
> #define encode_int64_t(pptr,x) do { \
> *(int64_t*) *(pptr) = cpu_to_le64(*(x)); \
> *(pp
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:02 AM Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:20 PM Mike Marshall wrote:
> >
> > Hi Deepa...
> >
> > I installed this patch series on top of Linux 5.3-rc6 and ran xfstests
> > on orangefs and got a regression... generic/258 failed
> > with: "Timestamp wrapped".
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:20 PM Mike Marshall wrote:
>
> Hi Deepa...
>
> I installed this patch series on top of Linux 5.3-rc6 and ran xfstests
> on orangefs and got a regression... generic/258 failed
> with: "Timestamp wrapped"...
>
> # cat results/generic/258.out.bad
> QA output created by 258
>
Hi Deepa...
I installed this patch series on top of Linux 5.3-rc6 and ran xfstests
on orangefs and got a regression... generic/258 failed
with: "Timestamp wrapped"...
# cat results/generic/258.out.bad
QA output created by 258
Creating file with timestamp of Jan 1, 1960
Testing for negative second
Adding the others who were on original cc, just in case.
- Deepa
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:12 PM Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>
> Hi Al, Arnd,
>
> This is a pull request for filling in min and max timestamps for filesystems.
> I've added all the acks, and dropped the adfs patch. That will be merged
> t
