Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address

2024-05-23 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Fixed the stable mailing list. On 05/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Could you please consider to cherry-pick this patch in stable-6.9, since > there are many users suffering from unnecessary fsck runs during boot? > > You can get this from Linus's tree by > (b864ddb57eb0 "f2fs: fix false

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address

2024-05-23 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Greg, Could you please consider to cherry-pick this patch in stable-6.9, since there are many users suffering from unnecessary fsck runs during boot? You can get this from Linus's tree by (b864ddb57eb0 "f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address") Thanks, On 05/20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address

2024-04-25 Thread patchwork-bot+f2fs
Hello: This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev) by Jaegeuk Kim : On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:35:48 + you wrote: > f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is > not the corruption case. > > Cc: # v6.9+ > Bugzilla:

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address

2024-04-24 Thread Chao Yu
On 2024/4/25 1:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is not the corruption case. Cc: # v6.9+ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr")