On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 09:04:12AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:21:29PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:54:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:33:17PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 2:18 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:21:29PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:54:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:33:17PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 2:18 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:54:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:54:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:10 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This patch add an ioctl to shutdown f2fs, which stops all the further block
writes after this point.
would it make sense to just re-use the xfs ioctl nr, if the semantics are
the same?
On 1/8/15 2:18 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:54:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:10 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This patch add an ioctl to shutdown f2fs, which stops all the further block
writes after this point.
would it make sense to just re-use the xfs ioctl nr,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:33:17PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 2:18 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:54:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:10 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This patch add an ioctl to shutdown f2fs, which stops all the further
block
writes
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:54:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:33:17PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 2:18 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:54:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:10 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This patch add an ioctl
