On 2024/8/13 14:11, Yeongjin Gil wrote:
In f2fs_do_write_data_page, when the data block is NULL_ADDR, it skips
writepage considering that it has been already truncated.
This results in an infinite loop as the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE tag is not
cleared during the writeback process for a compressed f
Thanks for your review. I will send patch v2.
>On 2024/8/13 14:11, Yeongjin Gil wrote:
>> In f2fs_do_write_data_page, when the data block is NULL_ADDR, it skips
>> writepage considering that it has been already truncated.
>> This results in an infinite loop as the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE tag is
>> n
On 08/15, Diogo Jahchan Koike wrote:
> No problem whatsoever.
Thanks. I removed the original patch from -next. Chao, please post a fixed
version.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Em qua., 14 de ago. de 2024, 21:51, Chao Yu escreveu:
>
> > On 2024/8/15 5:16, Diogo Jahchan Koike wrote:
> > > fix reader lock unr
Hi Chao Yu,
>
>- Original Message -
>Sender : Chao Yu
>Date : 2024-08-14 18:50 (GMT+9)
>Title : Re: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unused block when dio write in LFS mode
>
>On 2024/8/1 15:47, Daejun Park wrote:
>> This patch addresses the problem that when using LFS mode, unused blocks
>>
atomic write can only be used via buffered IO, let's fail direct IO on
atomic_file and return -EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
v2:
- fix error path handling.
fs/f2fs/file.c | 36
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f
Hi Chao Yu,
>
>- Original Message -
>Sender : Chao Yu
>Date : 2024-08-15 12:33 (GMT+9)
>Title : Re: [PATCH] f2fs-tools: add write hint support
>
>On 2024/8/9 15:32, Daejun Park wrote:
>> This patch enables support for write hints by segment type.
>
>What about adding an option t
On 2024/8/16 8:17, Daejun Park wrote:
Hi Chao Yu,
- Original Message -
Sender : Chao Yu
Date : 2024-08-14 18:50 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unused block when dio write in LFS mode
On 2024/8/1 15:47, Daejun Park wrote:
This patch addresses the problem that when
On 8/16/24 11:23, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> As the helper function f2fs_bdev_support_discard() shows, f2fs checks if
> the target block devices support discard by calling
> bdev_max_discard_sectors() and bdev_is_zoned(). This check works good
s/good/well
> for most cases, but it does not work
As the helper function f2fs_bdev_support_discard() shows, f2fs checks if
the target block devices support discard by calling
bdev_max_discard_sectors() and bdev_is_zoned(). This check works good
for most cases, but it does not work for conventional zones on zoned
block devices. F2fs assumes that zo
Hi Chao Yu,
>
>- Original Message -
>Sender : Chao Yu
>Date : 2024-08-16 10:56 (GMT+9)
>Title : Re: (2) [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unused block when dio write in LFS mode
>
>On 2024/8/16 8:17, Daejun Park wrote:
>> Hi Chao Yu,
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> Sender :
As the helper function f2fs_bdev_support_discard() shows, f2fs checks if
the target block devices support discard by calling
bdev_max_discard_sectors() and bdev_is_zoned(). This check works well
for most cases, but it does not work for conventional zones on zoned
block devices. F2fs assumes that zo
Thank you for the comments. Will reflect them and post v2.
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
