Since max_nid value was minus three in previous commit:
'b63da15e8b475245026bdf2096853683f189706b', Our last three nids could not be
used ever, but 0/node nid/meta nid is still occupied.
And also our ra_meta_pages() could not readahead the last block of NAT.
Let's fix the wrong calculation of this
This patch introduce raw_nat_from_node_info() to simplfy some codes, and also
use exist function node_info_from_raw_nat() to do the same job.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 15 +++
fs/f2fs/node.h |8
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff
Hi,
But would not ability to trigger BUG_ON by mounting a crafted image
considered as an issue having security implications?
Regards,
Alexey
On 16.04.2014 16:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-04-16 (수), 13:11 +0400, Andrey Tsyvarev:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With this patch mounting of the image continu
Hi,
2014-04-16 (수), 13:11 +0400, Andrey Tsyvarev:
> Hi,
>
> With this patch mounting of the image continues to fail (with similar
> BUG_ON).
> But when image is formatted again (and steps mentioned in the previous
> message are performed),
> mounting of it is now succeed.
>
> Is this is a true
If it occurs an error, we should call f2fs_unlock_op.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/inline.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
index 383db1f..3258c7c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
TO: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
How are you?
We get your email address from internet, hope you are our target customer and
hope we didn't disturb you.
We write this email to you as we want to find a way to build business
relationship with you. This time, we want to introduce our produc
Hi,
With this patch mounting of the image continues to fail (with similar
BUG_ON).
But when image is formatted again (and steps mentioned in the previous
message are performed),
mounting of it is now succeed.
Is this is a true purpose of the patch?
15.04.2014 15:04, Jaegeuk Kim пишет:
> Hi,
>
