Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:15 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:15 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4] f2fs
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 3:14 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:13 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: avoid un
The __f2fs_commit_super is static.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 597b533..75704d9 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ next:
re
If get_node_page() gets zero nid, we can return early without getting a wrong
page. For example, get_dnode_of_data() can try to do that.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 341de5d..e17128d 100
If f2fs_write_begin is to update data, we can bypass calling f2fs_lock_op() in
order to avoid the checkpoint latency in the write syscall.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 43 ++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
This patch adds prepare_write_begin to clean f2fs_write_begin.
The major role of this function is to convert any inline_data and allocate
or find block address.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 92 ++
1 file changed, 54 inser
Hi Chao,
Right.
But, in the rename path, we still need to do f2fs_balance_fs, since it produces
another dirty node page in the mean time.
How about this?
>From bbc5bf8f6c940cd75a4d71ce40ce4bd3f647a823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:56:08 -0800
Subject: [PAT
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 3:00 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4 v2] f2fs: record node block alloc
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 2:55 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2
Change log v2:
- add dio case
>From c2d16a526371954671f9c8cff5f09f9d230f7993 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:23:35 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed
If user tries to update or read data, we don't need to call f2fs_b
Hi Chao,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 05:46:59PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:00 AM
> > To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-dev
Change log from v1:
- remove redundant set
- adjust memory alignment
>From 60c6a898094535e850268dd77701255a37cce3d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:59:54 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: record node block allocation in dnode_of_data
This patch introduces record
Hi Chao,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:00:36PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:00 AM
> > To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-dev
Chang log from v1:
- add more cases
>From 9fea6346f5dd2992525e853e27a4fe899d122379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:56:08 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations
The f2fs_balance_fs doesn't need to cover f2fs_new_inode or f2f
> -Original Message-
> From: He YunLei [mailto:heyun...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 8:35 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2
If inline_data option is disable, when truncating an inline inode with
size which is not exceed maxinum inline size, we should not convert
inline inode to regular one to avoid the overhead of synchronizing
conversion.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
fs/f2fs/inline.c | 3 ---
fs/f2fs/namei.c | 2 +-
do_checkpoint and write_checkpoint can fail due to reasons like triggering
in a readonly fs or encountering IO error of storage device.
So it's better to report such error info to user, let user be aware of
failure of doing checkpoint.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 29 ++
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:00 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:00 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs
21 matches
Mail list logo
