On 2019/9/29 10:20, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 08:53:05AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2019/9/28 2:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> On 09/25, Chao Yu wrote:
evict() should be called once i_count is zero, rather than i_nlinke
is zero.
R
在 星期日, 2019-09-29 08:56:25 Chao Yu 撰写
> Hi Chengguang,
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch, previously I've sent a patch to fix most
> inconsistent comments including below one, could you check that?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20190927102305.11587-1-yuch...@huawei.c
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 08:53:05AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2019/9/28 2:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On 09/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> evict() should be called once i_count is zero, rather than i_nlinke
> >> is zero.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Gao Xiang
> >> Signed-off-b
On 2019/9/25 16:05, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2019 / 17:42, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/9/18 11:07, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>>> Thanks for the comments. I read f2fs code further, and think still the
>>> SIT vs write pointer check can be implemented and meaningful.
>>>
>>> F2fs ensure
Hi Chengguang,
Thanks a lot for the patch, previously I've sent a patch to fix most
inconsistent comments including below one, could you check that?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20190927102305.11587-1-yuch...@huawei.com/T/#u
Thanks,
On 2019/9/28 9:40, Chengguang Xu via Linux-f2fs-de
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2019/9/28 2:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> On 09/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>> evict() should be called once i_count is zero, rather than i_nlinke
>> is zero.
>>
>> Reported-by: Gao Xiang
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
