> On Nov 11, 2021, at 2:59 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:47 AM Nick Terrell wrote:
>>
>> I just wanted to make sure that you’ve received my pull request. I’m a newbie
>> here, so I want to make sure I’m not making a stupid mistake that means
>> you’ve
>> missed
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:47 AM Nick Terrell wrote:
>
> I just wanted to make sure that you’ve received my pull request. I’m a newbie
> here, so I want to make sure I’m not making a stupid mistake that means you’ve
> missed my message. I’d hate for this PR to not even be considered for merging
>
> On Nov 8, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Nick Terrell wrote:
>
> From: Nick Terrell
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> I am sending you a pull request to add myself as the maintainer of zstd and
> update the zstd version in the kernel, which is now 4 years out of date,
> to the latest zstd release. This includes bug
On 11/11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So question on the direct I/O code. The perfectly fine iomap code
> wasn't merged because of the pre-existing stale data exposure issuewith
> f2fs direct I/O low-level implementation. This doesn't seem to be fixed
> or even worked around, but instead we do
So question on the direct I/O code. The perfectly fine iomap code
wasn't merged because of the pre-existing stale data exposure issuewith
f2fs direct I/O low-level implementation. This doesn't seem to be fixed
or even worked around, but instead we do get new direct I/O features?
On Wed, Nov 10,
