Hi,
Thank you for the report.
Could you share the kernel and f2fs-tools versions?
Let me check.
Thank you,
2014-03-23 23:22 GMT+09:00 folkert folk...@vanheusden.com:
Hi,
Got an assertion failed in fsck.f2fs:
Info: sector size = 512
Info: total sectors = 7503872 (in 512bytes)
Assertion
Hi,
2013/9/11 Chao Yu chao2...@samsung.com
Hi Kim,
I did some tests as you mention of using random instead of spin_lock.
The test model is as following:
eight threads race to grab one of eight locks for one thousand times,
and I used four methods to generate lock num:
Hi Russ,
The usage of fs_locks is for the recovery, so it doesn't matter
with stress-testing.
Actually what I've concerned is that we should not grab two or
more fs_locks in the same call path.
Thanks,
2013/9/11 Russ Knize russ.kn...@motorola.com:
Hi Jaegeuk/Gu,
I've removed the lock and have
Hi Gu,
2013/9/11 Gu Zheng guz.f...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi Jaegeuk, Chao,
On 09/10/2013 08:52 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi,
At first, thank you for the report and please follow the email writing
rules. :)
Anyway, I agree to the below issue.
One thing that I can think of is that we don't need
