[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-07-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 --- Comment #8 from Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) --- It's here, it should be merged in AOSP as well. :) https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs-stable.git/commit/?h=linux-4.14.y=3cc9792fa1ea67bbfdaee28737e37f9045976b76 -- You

[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-07-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 --- Comment #7 from phiber2...@gmx.de --- (In reply to Chao Yu from comment #6) > Was fixed with a backported patch ("f2fs: fix to skip verifying block > address for non-regular inode") Maybe my mistake, but I can't find the backported patch in

[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-07-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 phiber2...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||phiber2...@gmx.de --- Comment #5

[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 --- Comment #4 from JWalker (jw7...@gmail.com) --- Hi Chao, I’ve applied all incremental patches up to, including 4.14.101. I can also confirm that my build is a %100 match between the .xz file on kernel.org ( with respect to fs/* ). Yes ,

[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-02-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 --- Comment #3 from Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) --- (In reply to JWalker from comment #2) > Hi Chao, > > The kernal code was taken from the raspberry pi git repo, and then the > incremental patches applied. What patches do you applied? some

[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-02-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 --- Comment #2 from JWalker (jw7...@gmail.com) --- Hi Chao, The kernal code was taken from the raspberry pi git repo, and then the incremental patches applied. Yes, fsck has been applied. Please see below the output of the both volumes. Please

[f2fs-dev] [Bug 202495] oops in fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:150 f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr

2019-02-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495 Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@kernel.org --- Comment