On 2018/12/1 4:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/30, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/11/30 10:35, Sheng Yong wrote:
>>> Hi, Jaegeuk and Chao,
>>>
>>> On 2018/11/29 1:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/11/28 16:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> Hi
On 11/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/11/30 10:35, Sheng Yong wrote:
> > Hi, Jaegeuk and Chao,
> >
> > On 2018/11/29 1:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2018/11/28 16:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaeguek,
> >
> > On 2018/11/28
On 2018/11/30 10:35, Sheng Yong wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk and Chao,
>
> On 2018/11/29 1:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2018/11/28 16:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaeguek,
>
> On 2018/11/28 15:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> If we want
Hi, Jaegeuk and Chao,
On 2018/11/29 1:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2018/11/28 16:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaeguek,
On 2018/11/28 15:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
If we want to re-enable nat_bits, we rely on fsck which requires full scan
of directory
On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/11/28 16:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaeguek,
> >>
> >> On 2018/11/28 15:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> If we want to re-enable nat_bits, we rely on fsck which requires full scan
> >>> of directory tree. Let's do that by regular fsck
On 2018/11/28 16:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaeguek,
>>
>> On 2018/11/28 15:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> If we want to re-enable nat_bits, we rely on fsck which requires full scan
>>> of directory tree. Let's do that by regular fsck or unclean shutdown.
>>
>>
On 11/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaeguek,
>
> On 2018/11/28 15:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > If we want to re-enable nat_bits, we rely on fsck which requires full scan
> > of directory tree. Let's do that by regular fsck or unclean shutdown.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
>
> BTW, I have patch made some
Hi Jaeguek,
On 2018/11/28 15:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> If we want to re-enable nat_bits, we rely on fsck which requires full scan
> of directory tree. Let's do that by regular fsck or unclean shutdown.
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
BTW, I have patch made some month ago...
In order to detect nat_bits
If we want to re-enable nat_bits, we rely on fsck which requires full scan
of directory tree. Let's do that by regular fsck or unclean shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
