On 10/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/10/17 10:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 10/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk, Jens,
> >>
> >> On 2018/10/17 3:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> Thanks Jens,
> >>>
> >>> On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
> >>> the idle time by the
On 2018/10/17 10:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/17, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk, Jens,
>>
>> On 2018/10/17 3:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Thanks Jens,
>>>
>>> On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
>>> the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO,
On 10/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk, Jens,
>
> On 2018/10/17 3:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Thanks Jens,
> >
> > On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
> > the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be
> > better to decouple f2fs with
Hi Jaegeuk, Jens,
On 2018/10/17 3:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Thanks Jens,
>
> On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
> the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be
> better to decouple f2fs with other layers, if possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
On 2018/10/17 0:20, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/16/18 10:06 AM, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> On 2018-10-16 22:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> This doesn't work on stacked devices, and it doesn't work on
>>> blk-mq devices. The request_list is only used on legacy, which
>>> we don't have much of
On 10/16/18 1:31 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/16, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 1:23 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Thanks Jens,
>>>
>>> On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
>>> the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be
>>> better to
On 10/16, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/16/18 1:23 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Thanks Jens,
> >
> > On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
> > the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be
> > better to decouple f2fs with other layers, if
On 10/16/18 1:23 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Thanks Jens,
>
> On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
> the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be
> better to decouple f2fs with other layers, if possible.
I agree, that's what got us into
Thanks Jens,
On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect
the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be
better to decouple f2fs with other layers, if possible.
Thanks,
>From 85daf5190671b3d98ef779bdea77b4a046658708 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On 10/16/18 10:06 AM, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On 2018-10-16 22:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> This doesn't work on stacked devices, and it doesn't work on
>> blk-mq devices. The request_list is only used on legacy, which
>> we don't have much of anymore, and soon won't have any of.
>>
>> Kill the
Hi Jens,
On 2018-10-16 22:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This doesn't work on stacked devices, and it doesn't work on
> blk-mq devices. The request_list is only used on legacy, which
> we don't have much of anymore, and soon won't have any of.
>
> Kill the check.
In order to avoid conflicting with
This doesn't work on stacked devices, and it doesn't work on
blk-mq devices. The request_list is only used on legacy, which
we don't have much of anymore, and soon won't have any of.
Kill the check.
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
