Hi Chao,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:31:16PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 2:15 AM
To: Chao Yu
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject:
Hi Chao,
BTW, isn't there any problem on update_inode/mark_inode_dirty stuffs?
And, is there a hole to write uncompleted node pages unnecessarily?
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:52:00AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi Chao,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:31:16PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
Firstly, spliting init_inode_metadata into two parts as below since they
are relatively independent.
1) init_inode_metadata: init datas belong to newly created inode;
2) update_inode_metadata: update inode info for linking inode to new
dentry.
Secondly, move init_inode_metadata to the front of
