Hi Chao,
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:07:02PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
For exchange rename, we should check context consistent of encryption
between new_dir and old_inode or old_dir and new_inode. Otherwise
inheritance of parent's encryption context will be broken.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
Hi Jaegeuk,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:29 AM
To: Chao Yu
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs crypto: check context consistent
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:07:26AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi Chao,
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:07:02PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
For exchange rename, we should check context consistent of encryption
between new_dir and old_inode or old_dir and new_inode. Otherwise
inheritance of parent's
For exchange rename, we should check context consistent of encryption
between new_dir and old_inode or old_dir and new_inode. Otherwise
inheritance of parent's encryption context will be broken.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu chao2...@samsung.com
---
fs/f2fs/namei.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9
