On 2024/3/27 9:26, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:11 PM Chao Yu wrote:
On 2024/3/25 13:56, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
A length that exceeds the real size of the inode may be
specified from user, although these out-of-range areas
are not mapped, but they still need to be check in
while
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:11 PM Chao Yu wrote:
>
> On 2024/3/25 13:56, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
> > A length that exceeds the real size of the inode may be
> > specified from user, although these out-of-range areas
> > are not mapped, but they still need to be check in
> > while loop, which is
On 2024/3/25 13:56, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
A length that exceeds the real size of the inode may be
specified from user, although these out-of-range areas
are not mapped, but they still need to be check in
while loop, which is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu
---
v2: check i_size within inode
A length that exceeds the real size of the inode may be
specified from user, although these out-of-range areas
are not mapped, but they still need to be check in
while loop, which is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu
---
v2: check i_size within inode lock according to Chao's suggestions
---
