Hello:
This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim :
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:47:45 +0800 you wrote:
> The following f2fs_io test will get a "0" result instead of -EINVAL,
> unisoc # ./f2fs_io compress file
> unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks file
> 0
> it's not reasonable,
On 2024/3/6 11:47, Xiuhong Wang wrote:
The following f2fs_io test will get a "0" result instead of -EINVAL,
unisoc # ./f2fs_io compress file
unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks file
0
it's not reasonable, so the judgement of
atomic_read(_I(inode)->i_compr_blocks) should be placed after
the
The following f2fs_io test will get a "0" result instead of -EINVAL,
unisoc # ./f2fs_io compress file
unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks file
0
it's not reasonable, so the judgement of
atomic_read(_I(inode)->i_compr_blocks) should be placed after
the judgement of is_inode_flag_set(inode,
