On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:15:50PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 08:38:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:57:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Hi Valdis,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:11 AM Valdis Kletnieks
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:57:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Valdis,
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:11 AM Valdis Kletnieks
> wrote:
> > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one
> > patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and
>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:07:33PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one
> patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and
> (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through?
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o
On Wed 30-10-19 21:07:33, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one
> patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and
> (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through?
>
>
> There's currently 6 filesystems that
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:07:33PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch,
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong
> (b) should it be all in one patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6
> patches for 6 filesystems?), and
I don't particularly care, but I've a slight
Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one
patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and
(c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through?
There's currently 6 filesystems that have the same #define. Move it
into errno.h so it's defined in
