On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:47:56PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> Actually, I tried to prepare this quite long time ago [1], which was stuck
> that moment unfortunately, since I needed to wait for how AOSP finally treats
> with this feature. At some moment later, I couldn't even follow up every
Hi!
I consider adding file encryption to UBIFS.
While looking into ext4 and f2fs I realized that both
use the same data structures/concepts.
f2fs copy a lot from ext4.
Before I do the next copy, I'd to ask whether it would make sense
to more parts of the ioctl() interface out to VFS?
Let's
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:56:25PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I consider adding file encryption to UBIFS.
> While looking into ext4 and f2fs I realized that both
> use the same data structures/concepts.
When the ext4 code was first posted, I noted that 90% of the
implementation
Hello,
Actually, I tried to prepare this quite long time ago [1], which was stuck
that moment unfortunately, since I needed to wait for how AOSP finally treats
with this feature. At some moment later, I couldn't even follow up every ext4
changes into this patch set, since the feature was not
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:56:25PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> So, the data structures are identical and AFAIK also the supported cipher
> modes are.
> But as both use their own ioctls having a single tool to control file
> encryption
> can be error prone in future.
> Interestingly the
