On 2016/10/26 22:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:05:00 PM CEST Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2016/10/18 6:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen
>>> without a prior initialization:
>>>
>>>
On 2016/10/19 2:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> We don't need to allocate bio partially in order to maximize sequential
> writes.
We are going to allocate bio with max size supposing that there will be more
opportunity to merge small IOs into one bio. Otherwise, if MAX_BIO_BLOCKS is
smaller than
gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen
without a prior initialization:
fs/f2fs//git/arm-soc/fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_map_blocks’:
fs/f2fs/data.c:799:54: warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be used uninitialized in
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:14:04AM +0800, heyunlei wrote:
>
>
> On 2016/10/26 9:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Kim,
> > Hi Yunlei,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:37:28AM +0800, Yunlei He wrote:
> >> If one block has been to written to a new place, just return
> >> in move data process.
> >>
>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:28:04PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/10/19 2:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > We don't need to allocate bio partially in order to maximize sequential
> > writes.
>
> We are going to allocate bio with max size supposing that there will be more
> opportunity to merge small
